Government Puts Kibosh On Hunger Fast

Thus far, Texas Rep. Ron Paul has “responded” to the Petitions for Redress by having them “forwarded to the Clerk of the House.” 

While such a move is unique among the Members of the House, and is not a bad first step in etching the concept of Government accountability into the minds of some of the Members and advancing ever so slightly the question of the constitutional meaning of the last ten words of the First Amendment, it is highly unlikely that the Petitions for Redress will advance to House Committees for consideration, much less a vote to provide Redress. With the possible exception of Ron Paul, we know of no other politician willing to consider the notion of being held accountable to the People outside the periodic electoral process. 

 (continued...)

Click Here To Access the Update

Can the People elect their way out of such tyranny?

Unfortunately, no!  It is not possible, as Ron Paul’s candidacy has proven. Every time he exposed the constitutional truth regarding an issue (e.g., the undeclared Iraq war and the Federal Reserve System) he lost a block of voters who possess
a vested interest in the status quo.

What then is the solution?   (continued...)

Click Here To Access the Update

By now, the Petitions for Redress should have been delivered to every member of Congress and we should have been able to proudly proclaim, “Congress has been served!”

Unfortunately, we're not quite there yet.

To begin with, we timely mailed 1219 sets of Petition packages to over 700 people who volunteered to serve 535 members of Congress in their district offices on June 30, 2008, and to return to us a notarized proof of service. 

By July 3^rd and again after the July 4^th weekend we had received and were processing hundreds of returns from volunteers who had successfully completed service. However, by July 10^th it was apparent that 129 of the 535 members of Congress had still not been served! 

(continued...)

Click Here To Access the Update

NEXT: "PUBLICITY BOMB"

HERE: FREE AND EASY TOOL

June 30, 2008 may go down in history as the day Americans began, in earnest,
the moral and solemn process of holding their Government accountable to the Constitution by directly exercising their unalienable and individual Right of
Redress, rather than depending upon the will of the majority of votes as cast
in local precincts, the halls of Congress or the inner chambers of our
courthouses.  (continued...)

Click Here To Access the Update

Freedom Requires Bravery

Click Here To Access the Full Update

    Click here to make a donation to receive the historic poster.

April 12, 2008

The Constitutional Conspiracy:

Courts Colluding With White House
to Avoid Accountability

The proof is in. The federal courts have been found to be co-conspirators with the Executive Branch in a collusive scheme to avoid being held accountable to the Constitution by the People.  

There can be no doubt. The federal judiciary is now being utilized as an weapon of oppression rather than for the ends of Justice for which it was designed.
 

Not only has the Judiciary abandoned its role as an independent arbiter of legal controversies involving injured citizens seeking remediation for Government wrongs, the Judiciary now refuses to even discuss the most basic, underlying Founding Principles upon which our Republic rests, i.e., the Rights of the People to Sovereignty and to hold Government accountable -- particularly its obligation to respond to Petitions for Redress of constitutional torts as provided by the First Amendment.

The most egregious result of these developments is that not only are the People effectively unable to secure Redress against Government entities that have harmed them, but the Judiciary has now abdicated its fundamental function under the Constitution by refusing to interpret the Constitution where questions of the Sovereignty of the People are implicated. (continued...)

Click Here To Access the Full Update

“SHAMEFUL AND TREASONOUS” 

Petition for Rehearing Filed
in Landmark Right-to-Petition Case

Taking advantage of one final procedural step to ask the U.S. Supreme
Court to hear the landmark Right to Petition case, on February 1st
Bob Schulz filed a Petition for Rehearing. 

“According to its own precedent, this Court would be abdicating its duty and committing treason to the Constitution if it fails to [accept jurisdiction
and hear this case]” wrote Schulz. “Tyranny marks a government that
ignores its free People.” 

Schulz also wrote that it would be “shameful” for the Court to fail to hear this first impression question of extreme public importance involving the interpretation of the Constitution while agreeing to hear the probate/bankruptcy/defamation case of Anna Nicole Smith.  

“Shall the People in republican America, with its written Constitution for the protection of the public Rights and a body of strictly limited powers, now be forbidden to do that which the Framers’ intended?” asked Schulz. 

Day of Prayer and Fasting: July 1st

Click Here To Access the Full Update

Washington Post Gets It Right

(continued...)

Stand In Support Of Our Petitions for Redress

Full “V” Costumes Available for $55 !

(continued...)

Click Here To Access the Full Update

Within months, in all probability just before the Easter break, the hot topic of the day in every single law school in America will be the decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals in our case entitled, We The People v. The U.S. Government. 

Given the enormous and far-reaching implications of this decision, either in favor of the People or against them, law school professors everywhere will be anxious to analyze and “mine” the decision, discussing it in their faculty and academic forums and bringing it the attention of the young minds that fill their classrooms. Many will likely rush to further explore the gravity of the ruling and publish articles in Law Review journals.  

It will be an exciting time, indeed -- especially for the ordinary non-aligned citizen taxpayers of this great Country. 

The excitement will permeate Give Me Liberty 2007, our three-day conference scheduled for March 29-31.  

Think about it. For the first time in the entire history of our nation -- since the adoption of our Bill of Rights in 1791-- a Court is about to declare the legal meaning of one of the five individual Rights guaranteed by the First Amendment. 

Not just any Right, but the mother of all Rights -- the Right that caps all the others, the so-called “Capstone Right.”

(continued...)

Click Here To Access The Full Update